Natural Building in Comparison to Stick Frame

It’s easy to be distracted and even wowed by glitzy features in a new house – a built-in entertainment unit, hot tub, walk-in closets, custom cabinets, and more. But the next time you’re in a stick frame house, really stop to think about what the house itself is made of. It’s actually just a thin shell of wood sticks covered with sheetrock (chalk and paper) on the inside, and often fiberboard (sawdust and toxic glue) on the outside. The materials in these stick frame houses are like a ticking time bomb. You know they’re going to fail before too long and cause untold problems.

The wood will crack, bow, bend, split and attract all sorts of pests like termites. And stick built houses burn like crazy. Engineered wood products (OSB, etc.) off-gas toxic chemicals in fires that actually kill more people than the flames.

You can hear and feel the wind blowing through the walls of a stick frame house on a cold, windy day. Sit for a few minutes by a window or put your hand in front of an electrical outlet to feel the breeze coming through. That’s why heating and cooling bills are astronomical.

Try not to breathe while you’re in one of these conventionally built houses. A typical home has hundreds of volatile chemicals and because of this the number of people suffering from sick building syndrome is on the rise. Almost every product in these new homes off-gas chemicals that endanger one’s health.

Also, mold is an ever-present danger in stick frame houses, especially in humid climates, basements, bathrooms and kitchens. Particle board cabinets, heating ducts, paper facing on sheetrock, and other materials all foster the growth of mold.

And, frighteningly, stick frame houses are a death trap in hurricanes and tornadoes. Just ask residents of Greenburg, Kansas whose houses were wiped off the map, or those from New Orleans. Stick frame is no match for nature’s fury, whose storms are increasing in size and intensity almost yearly.

Doesn’t sound very comforting, does it? When will people catch on?

Natural building, in contrast, has a long, long track record and is far superior to conventional building in many ways. Let’s briefly compare stick frame building with two natural building options.

Straw-bale construction is a no-brainer. Regular readers of The Last Straw Journal know the benefits, but most of the general population doesn’t. Straw-bale homes are (deep breath) durable, environment and owner-builder friendly, fire resistant, insect and rodent resistant (once plastered), and provide excellent insulation. Straw-bale homes are safe, warm and quiet. One of the primary benefits of building with bales is the lower utility costs over the life of the building.

Earthbag building is ideally suited for areas prone to flooding, hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes and other natural disasters. Building with bags is a simple process of filling polypropylene feed or rice bags with soil, sand, gravel or similar material, and tamping the bags solid. You can use sand in the desert, soil in most climates, or porous volcanic rock such as scoria in cold climates. Scoria-filled bags approach R-30, at least those sealed with papercrete. (I lived in a house built this way through a Colorado winter and the R-30 value is for real.) In addition, unlike other earth building methods, no special mix is required. Just use what is readily available, often the soil on or near the site is best. Also, it is easy to make roundhouses, domes, vaults and organically shaped structures with earthbags.

6 thoughts on “Natural Building in Comparison to Stick Frame”

  1. Come to think of it, the conventional American housing paradigm is kinda silly. The overwhelming majority of houses and apartments in North America are money pits, costing several thousand bucks a month in utilities, rent or mortgage, insurance, property taxes, homeowners association fees if applicable. And because of the 8-to-5 standard work day 5 days a week, the homeowners or tenants are only there most days to shit, shower, change clothes, and sleep. Weekends and a few holidays are the only days most people can actually enjoy their homes as more than just places to sleep and shower.

    Reply
  2. Perhaps one of the greatest advantages with alternative, natural building materials and methods is they tend to be much less expensive. In many areas where such alternative building systems are allowed, you can build a fully functional dwelling with a bathroom, kitchenette, and most modern conveniences for somewhere between $18,000 and $50,000, quite the bargain when you consider that the average North American house costs in the ballpark of $450,000 to $680,000 to build. There’s an affordable housing crisis right now as inflation and increased zoning red tape (not to mention the greedy big box developers that practically monopolize the new construction housing market in many cities) push up home prices and rents to absurd, unaffordable levels!

    Reply
  3. What about humid climates? I live in south eastern Ohio and it gets super humid in the summer and from friends that live in cob and straw bale houses (non AC) they have real problems with mold. What do you suggest then?

    I really want to build a house in this climate using natural materials from the area, but i want it to be comfortable and less hassle.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.