Stone houses and almost no electricity — 5 Comments

  1. Wonderful. Thanks for this. Slipform method is supposed to be a lot easier. So, the advice above can be overlooked about being sparing when working with stone.

    • It’s still a LOT of work. Stonework is slow and difficult no matter how you do it. But I love the look of stone and I like to work some into the design in key focal areas.

      • Slipform stone construction is described as: “easy for a novice to build free-standing stone walls”. Loads of info available, too. And great books. One, by Tomm Stanley, called Stone House: A Guide to Self-Building with Slipforms, he uses a lot of rebar, being in an earthquake prone area. Seems to be different styles of approaches from one person to the next, but essentially, all making it attractive for new builders.

        • Don’t misunderstand. Stone building is a LOT of hard work no matter what method you use. Working with stone in general is the slowest method. I recommend volunteering on a house raising party in your area. These are free events where the community helps someone build their house in exchange for learning and a free lunch. You will soon see stone building is not “easy”, ha ha. It’s like lifting weights all day. And to be fair, earthbag building is not “easy” either. I usually use words like simple, low tech and fairly fast. For instance, groups of untrained villagers in Nepal are building earthbag walls for 2-classroom schools in Nepal in 10-14 days. This is around 20-50 times faster than stone building. Plus, earthbag requires less rebar and concrete because it’s more resilient/flexible and therefore more earthquake resistant than stone building. Most stone buildings in Nepal collapsed last year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>