Comments

Forging the Next Generation of Natural Designers and Builders — 7 Comments

  1. I am genuinely pleased to glance at this web site posts which
    contains plenty of helpful information, thanks for providing these statistics.

  2. I like the idea definitely. I don’t know where you’ve come in your conclusions of doing this. Though you’d know more than me about what particularly is needed I assume that you would need land, material, and funding of some sort. I’d have to assume that you or another individual who’d teach would want to earn a certain amount to maintain their livelihood. And again I think you’d be more aware of what you need to properly teach so as far as in classroom, sitting down, and reading a book time I’m unaware of what you’d need and am unsure of how costly that would be. Assuming how ever that you would do a portion of any teaching in the field you could easily set up a cost sharing mechanism.

    Essentially in a college or vocational school as I understand it You pay this big portion to the school that pays the teachers salary, a small portion goes to administrative costs, and then a large portion goes to profit. This of course doesn’t include the entire cost of the education. The students then have to cover their costs (books and materials).

    Though more detail would need to be worked out a cost sharing system could be used. You control some of the costs yourself. You have the knowledge and you set the price for that knowledge to be shared. First you’d need to know exactly how much it’s going to cost you to share that knowledge and then you’d have to make a decision on how much you want to profit and if at all. These would be the initial costs to your students. Hands on teaching would require land and material. me I’m a private actor in this affair. I own a piece of land and do want a house built on it to live in but I haven’t the money to build a house due to the many issues that you are aware of. I give you use of the land to build a house for me. I or the students or both pay for your costs in getting to an lodging in the area were the house is to be built if this were significantly away from your area of residence. My absolute cost I share are all administrative costs of the project. (building permits and ect). The students would be responsible for your costs specifically or the price you’ve put on your knowledge, and their own lodging and upkeep. The land owner should have no adverse problem to allowing camping on their property, Room permitted and weather allowing of course.

    Material cost would be a shared responsibility between the land owner and the students (depending on the case and assuming you’d take on charitable cases) and hoping that most of the material would be obtainable there and most material could be come across in a fairly cheap manner (ReStores, thrift stores, easily recyclable material, and ect).

    But anyway such a system as this (though it may need to be worked on and refined) would cut alot of costs.

    • I’m just talking out loud in general terms to stimulate discussion. It’s highly unlikely I will be involved in lots of training since I live in the middle of nowhere. Plus, I’m totally happy doing what I’m doing — writing and designing houses. Other places are developing a good track record and are much more accessible and popular. Look for workshops and ‘barn raisings’ near you to minimize travel. Actually, you can learn everything you need by scouring the Internet and building one or more small structures. Earthbag building (and most natural building methods) are primarily hands-on skills. If you’ve done the basic research (Step-by-Step Earthbag Building http://www.instructables.com/id/Step-by-Step-Earthbag-Building/ and YouTube videos http://www.youtube.com/user/naturalhouses), everything will fall into place when you get out there are start stacking bags.

    • Absolutely. Public schools are more focused on developing obedient workers for the job force rather than teaching critical thinking. I’m convinced this is by design, not accidental.

  3. As a child, I would have rather just read books to gain knowledge than go through that individuality removal machine.

    Take history for example. We are supposed to learn from it. Yet my history books didn’t even mention that previous generations built their own houses. The closest it got was with a brief mention of Amish barn raising. It didn’t mention that the sacred Founding Fathers grew hemp. How are children supposed to learn from an incomplete and rewritten history? Why did we have to spend so much time on what amounts to fantasy and then get graded on it?

    In Math, we force kids to use paper notations and calculators to figure out answers instead of letting them develop the ability to do it all in their heads. The reasons teachers gave me when I was a little terror were:

    “Well if you make a mistake, it allows us to show you where you went wrong.”
    “It allows us to give you partial credit if you just have a minor mistake.”
    “It helps prove that you aren’t cheating.”

    This is what they said to me as I got the highest score in the class and finished first. I can only imagine what they are spouting now. They probably just call in the school police officer and drag the kid off.

    Then there was English class, the class where they taught you to plagiarize spelling definitions and then act surprised when you do it later on with essays. English isn’t a dead language like Latin nor does it have a government panel deciding changes like French. English is a constantly evolving language. A person doesn’t make an error in English with spelling or grammar; instead they are attempting to change the language itself. How educational institutes can assign a grade letter to it boggles my mind.

    Science class was one of the better classes out of the whole ordeal. Finally some useful knowledge to apply to the world. It is a shame most of us won’t be able to use that knowledge in the service economy our rulers want to create.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>